Max Spevack wrote:
(1) Features, led by John Poelstra. This group tracks feature development (from spec through code) for various things that we'd like to have end up in Fedora at some point.
I think this proposal is solid but I would like to have a clarification here. Is John Poelstra going to arbitrate features or just going to keep track of them? If he is keeping track of these features how do they end up in the features list? Are they going to get proposed and added by various teams and SIG's within Fedora or they driven by a higher level group? A combination of both of these?
If there are disputes regarding the features being proposed or the schedule between releases (A strict schedule would avoid this problem unless we want to change it for a particular release as a exception), is it the responsibility of FESCo or Fedora Board to arbitrate on them?
Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
