On 08.06.2007 07:54, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> I don't think the best way to work better with RH IS is to bypass RH IS (: If >> we come up with a way to determine who within Fedora space is allowed to >> request mailing lists, and come up for a way for RH IS to verify this, then >> it should be fine. I think Matt Domsch has done some things like this for >> getting new mirrors signed up. This doesn't sound like a hard problem to >> solve. > If someone from the Fedora Infrastructure team like Mike has direct > access to it, that might work well. Currently it takes like a couple of > weeks to just setup a mailing list or close one. That is not too much of > a trouble but it is a pain nevertheless. +1 Further: when I closed fedora-extras-list there was no easy way to get a full subscribers list from the webinterface (I wanted to invite all of them to fedora-devel) (¹). According to my research that would have been easy with direct access to the mailman host. An getting those lists easily would be really good *if* we want to reshuffle more lists, as we would be in similar situation there. CU thl (¹) -- yes, I know, one (often only the mailing list admins) can ask mailman for a list of all subscribed users from the web interface; but it's possible to set a hidden flag to not get listed there; quite a few of our users that that flag afaik _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
