On May 16, 2007, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does this splitting up the legal section into a separate policy > document managed by Fedora Project Board sense to folks here? I can > present a draft. Yes, it makes a lot of sense to me, thanks for bringing this up. FWIW, this was one of the various issues I still felt I needed feedback on before submitting a draft with the process you're insisting that I follow, but that you just turn around and refrain from following. Good thing we're on the same page, after all. Even though you've unilaterally took this effort out of my hands, I'll note that I have no objections to this move, and I'll point that I will provide you with a copy of the text that I've worked on and that I'm waiting for feedback from other FSFes on as soon as I get it. I'm sorry that it's taken so long. I'm actually happy that you couldn't wait, it's this kind of excitement that we need ;-) Best regards, -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
