On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 19:41 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Perhaps it would make sense to also add a note explaining that Fedora > is committed to not distributing [non-firmware] software in such a way > that the software wouldn't abide by these definitions, from the point > of view of the recipients. E.g. software licensed under a Free > Software license but without corresponding sources. If the reader > finds deviations s/he should report them. Or perhaps, more simply, that all software [non-firmware] in Fedora must include source code. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
