Re: Release Engineering Meeting Recap from Monday 16-APR-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer wrote:
This release was all that was discussed.  If new proposals for future
releases come to bear, this topic can be revisited.  For now, a note
will be placed in the Release Notes for F7 about packages potentially
containing .fcX where X can be different from the current release.

You have just a day before the docs are frozen.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Schedule. I am editing the release notes right now so if anyone has suggestions for the wording let me know. My proposal for the future release is essentially the same as the one now preferably early during the devel cycle and no later than the feature freeze

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-April/msg00137.html

I wanted FESCo to decide on the issue on the whole rather than just for this release as the last time I requested it was before the test 4 release. That was ignored somehow it a bit too late to do rebuilds.

So let me place a request now for FESCo to consider a general approach on dealing with dist tags early during Fedora 8 development. Also we might have delta rpms by default then so the argument of lesser churn of packages becomes weak.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux