Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 27.03.2007 19:47, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
Surely it's not in the interests of the 3rd party repos to contribute to
Fedora breakage. Right?
Is it *theroetically* possible to have a set of standards that unofficial
repos could follow to be less likely to break us? And if so, what
prevents those standards from being created, and met?
Maybe these are stupid questions -- but I like putting stupid questions on
the record.
/me put his 3rd party repo hat on
Hopefully the 3rd party stuff should get better soon with a potential
merge of some 3rd party repos (which got already mentioned in a board
meeting afaik).
I believe it was but I dont think I was in that meeting. Can you provide
more details on the merger? If it was discussed anywhere else pointers
would be just fine.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
