-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Max Spevack wrote: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/7/MustHave "Fedora 7 requires that the tools and documentation that make it as simple as possible to spin a custom distribution, using packages in Fedora as a base." What would be additionally useful is an explicit mention of: * What are the *cannot do* for the Custom Spins ? In terms of trademarks, 3rd Party Repos, 3rd Party Applications, Branding etc * A consistent messaging that the process of custom spins is not going to be one-off need based stuff but will have some bits from blessing from the Fedora Project Lead and those-who-matter * If required/requested Custom Spins (valid as per point #1) would be provided hosting infrastructure and their own their own subprojects lock-step with Fedora (Core) Going forward making a statement (if at all possible) that the Fedora tree of binaries and source bits are stuff from which folks are welcome to do spins (subject to clauses) and the Fedora project does its own spins called "Fedora" :Sankarshan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+OVd+g4kmZ76nyERArFXAJ0R3RM/zGq7N1kcYtvi+b14tcd8mwCfYf5h yjxTwY3gLaE3f6ue5K+u+po= =OUhU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
