On 2/8/07, Warren Togami wrote:
I don't seem to be overly negative, but what is a concrete example of a possible way to cooperate in a meaningful way?
I don't know. I just feel that if we meet them, we should talk as a fedora ambassador/contributor who was supposed to represent the whole fedora team. And this team should at least warned/informed us about what is best for it :) Now, knowing the fact that most of fedora people who will be there might only be a fedora contributor with little power and contribution experience, it would be best that "each" fedora project at least say something in respect of cooperation. People on the ground should at least be properly prepared by actual facts and not personal facts. It is the first time, that I have so many responsibilities towards the fedora project. I just want to be supported by the Fedora team for the best of Fedora. With the merge, we all see a strong fedora community, but there are many areas within the fedora project where we still have to work. This F7 release is a BIG step for both RH and community, let's help fedora ambassadors do their work properly. Let's now show that we the fedora project are definitely strong (and not strong in public reviews articles only). I just don't want to see a one-man show from the fedora project during the opensuse meeting regards, Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
