Re: kqemu is now GPLv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:09, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> If we would provide a way to at least give users a chance to get the free
> ones via standard fedora distribution ways (like the DKMS stuff as one
> example) we could eliminate one aspect that currently is missing for end
> users. I know that this is can not easily be solved as the long discussions
> showed before even the current kmod spec was used but if we work _together_
> now to find a solution all people could live with especially regarding bugs
> against fedora packages which originate from out of tree modules.

I don't want to see this, as I don't want external kernel modules to be seen 
at all as an acceptable scenario, be it temporary or permanent.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpvRXiMVZhxp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux