On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:24, Max Spevack wrote: > This seems reasonable to me. Everyone seems to agree that it's not ready > to be the default, but that doesn't preclude us from having in the Fedora > package set, and available for install. > > To me the question is between: > > 1) putting it on the Fedora Desktop ISO in a non-default capacity > > 2) just having it in the Fedora repository (what used to be Extras, what > now is "all the packages that aren't included on the 'official' ISOs") and > let people install it via pup/yum > > I don't necessarily have a strong opinion one way or the other. > > But I can't really think of any reason why it shouldn't be a part of > Fedora -- it's Free in all the senses that Fedora cares about, and folks > like ajax and jrb in our own community are behind it. IIRC we can just make it fall out of the xorg-x11-drivers-nv package as just another file. 'nv' would be used by default, but one could change 'nv' to 'nouveau' to test it out. No installing extra packages. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpjImVgJSy5h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
