Mike McGrath schrieb: > On 1/12/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bill Nottingham schrieb: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>>> - FESCo and the Core Cabal (f13 and notting [jeremy is a member of FESCO >>>> already]) become FTC -- Fedora Technical Committee (the final name still >>>> needs to be discussed, there are some alternatives floating around). >>> I'd suggest Fedora Distribution Committee (FEDCo?), as really, this is >>> all about the distributions we do. >> I'm fine with a FESDco *as long* as it's position is below the FTC >>> I'm open to more suggestions, but I >>> think FTC 1) has acronym collisions >> +1 >>> 2) is somewhat broad (infrastructure >>> is fairly technical, after all) >> See my reply to mmcgrath. > In the end I guess my concern is making sure that the groups are able > to focus on their task while avoiding noise. "Do one thing well, Play > well with others" And I think we tried that already with FESCo and PC in the past and it worked, but I was not to happy with it (it was not really bad either). That's why I want a strong groups that's involved in day-to-day things (the Board afaics does not want to get involved in those) an coordinates the work that is relevant for multiple groups. Or even overrule them if needed. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
