Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Bill Nottingham schrieb:
Under them are various subprojects - we have the infrastructure
project, the docs project, etc. So, what new structures do we
*need*?
Hear I to disagree. I think it does not work well if we have to much
projects on the same level if they have to interact a lot (and those two
your porpose have to interact a lot).
An reasons for my opinion: the communication and "who does foo" between
the Packaging Committee and FESCo sometimes sucked
IMO, the problem(s) experienced haven't been that these projects were on
the same level, but rather that there wasn't a clear description/mandate
of authority and bounds of said projects. In this instance (FESCo/FPC),
it was unclear whose job it was to enforce packaging policy.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
