Re: mailing-list reorganisation, round 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 18:07 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> second round in the process to solve the "we have to many mailinglists"
> problem (first round starts at
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-December/msg00104.html
> ; diff against first proposal:
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThorstenLeemhuis/MailingListReorganization?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1
> ). Comments? If I some "yeah, I tend to like it" I'll post it to the
> relevant mailing lists asking people to comment before we realize it.

> == Rename ==
> 
> === fedora-qa-list ==
> 
> Rename fedora-triage-list to fedora-qa-list and use it for wwoods
> efforts and his recruits.

This is fine. I've also got #fedora-qa on freenode now, so we can merge
all the -triage/testing stuff to -QA. Should make life a little easier.

When can fedora-qa-list be made active?

-w

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux