Re: Fedora release lifecyle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 22:35 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Look, lets be honest here.  Fedora isn't all that great of a distro for a 
> > stable server.  We don't do backports, we play with new technology, we've got 
> > a fast paced development cycle, etc...  Lets not try to be something we 
> > aren't.
> 
> Actually I find that ideal for a mail server. I _want_ to keep Exim,
> SpamAssassin and ClamAV up to date. All my servers run Fedora.

As do mine.  Fedora as a server is fine for quite a few people and use
cases.

josh

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux