On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:44, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > Sounds fine to me. But just make sure it's "I don't have the bandwith > > to do this, you're going to have to help me" not "Xen sucks, get it > > out." Xen _might_ suck because it's not upstream, but I don't think > > that's the problem we're really dealing with here. Just a guess, though. > > Its more of a 'xen upstream doesn't care about newer kernels nor Fedora, so we > have to do all the work ourselves, and um -ENOTIME' However if the xen stuff > were in upstream kernel, there is a much higher chance it would be working > before the upstream kernel made upstream releases and then we wouldn't have > this problem. Right. It's a bottleneck. I'm prevented from rebasing until the Xen team has found the cycles to bring the necessary bits up to speed. When this happens basically I have to go find something else to do. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
