On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:02 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > Oh, and there was the 'not really test4, but sort of' release that > was needed because test3, well.. stunk. There were a number of really > nasty bugs in that which meant it wouldn't even install for quite a > few people. How that one got out the building alive is anyones guess. Sorry! I'm supposed to keep that from happening, but I was in Rome on my honeymoon when that was released. I told the wife "I need to bring an x86_64 workstation for testing!" but nooooo, she just wouldn't listen.. -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
