Rahul Sundaram schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> we discussed the "to many mailinglists" problem now and then in the >> past. Most of us are annoyed by it, so here is a proposed cleanup. Comments? >> >> == Remove == >> >> === fedora-packaging-list === >> >> Packaging is important to all package maintainers. Everyone should get >> involved in the discussions and at least see the topics being discussed, >> thus do it directly on fedora-maintainers. Use a special tag like >> "[packaging]" to mark them if needed. >> >> === fedora-buildsys-list === >> >> It's quite a quiet list -- maybe we should leave it open for now until >> the plague/brew and VCS stuff is worked out, and then simply continue on >> fedora-devel. >> >> === fedora-extras-list === >> >> We should get rid of it when core merges with extras. Discuss the stuff >> on fedora-devel in the future. >> >> === fedora-test-list === >> >> A lot of people don't get the difference between fedora-devel and >> fedora-test list. And testing is a crucial part of the devel process, >> thus lets drop the test-list. > We have plans to post automated test suite results to the fedora-test > list on a daily basis once it is setup. I am not sure whether the > traffic for a merged list would be in a approachable level. Maybe automatic test could get still get send there if they are high volume. If not send them to fedora-devel with a unique tag -- people can route them to /dev/null if they want. But let's get rid of the separation between devel and testing for the other stuff as it complicates things to much and confuses things. Cu thk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
