Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said: > fedora-advisory-board > fedora-advisory-board-readonly > fedora-board-list > Should we merge the board-list to fab list? No. > fedora-announce-list > Fedora-maintainers-announce > Fedora-directory-announce > Fedora-legacy-announce > Lets merge all the announge lists to one. If need be people can filter I have no idea what maintainers-announce is for, but it's unlikely that it's the same purpose as fedora-announce. > fedora-devel-list > fedora-devel-java-list > Fedora-perl-devel-list > Fedora-r-devel-list > Fedora-directory-devel > fedora-test-list > fedora-extras-list > Fedora-relnotes-content > Fedora-packaging > merge all the devel lists into one Why? Shouldn't separate SIGs, such as perl or java, have their own list? Moreover, the directory server list is the *upstream* development list - it shouldn't be merged. > fedora-cvs-commits > fedora-extras-commits > Fedora-eclipse-commits > Fedora-directory-commits > lets merge all cvs commits to one list. i can always filter ones i dont want > out. Again, you want to separate upstream lists (directory) from Fedora lists. > Fedora-trans-ar > Fedora-trans-bn > Fedora-trans-bn_in > Fedora-trans-el > Fedora-trans-hi > Fedora-trans-ja > Fedora-trans-list > Fedora-i18n-list > Do we really need a translation list and a i18n list? One is i18n, one is l10n. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
