On 12.12.2006 23:37, Max Spevack wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
January 02 is probably to hard to reach, so we should cut one cycle from
four to three weeks. Which one? test3 maybe?
We talked about this in the Board meeting this morning.
thx
Here was the proposal we came up with (modified for a Tuesday release, not
a Monday release), working backward:
RH Summit May 9-11
Release April 24 (exactly 6 months after FC6)
BTW, that sounds as we stick to the 6 month release cycle again. I
thought there was some consensus from the last discussion that a long
term foreseeable release cycle (such as the one from Gnome) is a good
thing and that we want to aim for Early/Mid April and Early/Mid October.
The above now is nearly late April (without slipping).
So do people simply dislike the "long term foreseeable release cycle" or
was it simply forgotten again? Or could the board simply discuss this once?
Gold April 17
Test3 March 27
Test2 February 27
FudCon February 9-11 (including hackfest)
Test1 January 30
Not a lot of slip time in there (at least, not with the RH Summit as a
target).
Agreed, I would feel much more comfortable if we would have two weeks
puffer.
CU
thl
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
