On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 07:12 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > With 4 weeks for each test cycle that would mean: > > January 02 -- Test 1 > January 30 -- Test 2 > February 27 -- Test 3 > March 27 -- Final Release > > January 02 is probably to hard to reach, so we should cut one cycle from > four to three weeks. Which one? test3 maybe? If you have to cut a week from one cycle, I'd make it Test1. Test1 is the most likely to be broken in some unanticipated way, so it would be a good idea to plan for a (slightly) quicker followup release to that one. Also, I'd like to have a full 4 weeks after the No-Foolin' Seriously-Guys This-Is-It Feature Freeze (Test3) to make sure we've got the kinks worked out. Does that sound reasonable? -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
