On Monday 11 December 2006 15:17, Max Spevack wrote: > - Is the ball moving on version control stuff since the Fedora Summit? I > know Jesse continues to work on pungi, but I haven't seen (or just haven't > been looking in the right place) a lot of follow up about the distributed > version control. Where are we with that, etc? I thought this was supposed to take a backburner. It was noted that CVS _has_ some ACL stuff in place so that we can keep set permissions at a module level (does this include release branch, since these aren't really "branches"?) and that we don't _need_ a new SCM to accomplish the merger of core<->extras. Personally I think a new distributed SCM would make things like downstream distributions (olpc, etc..) easier, ditto secondary arches. There were strong concerns though of changing too much too quickly and not accomplishing the major goal(s) of the merger. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpTRwfNthvvh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
