Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said: > I never said that sparc should be primary arch just that if it is needed > hardware can be made available where ever it is needed and PPC can still be > built when core is migrated to the new buildsys. so it need not become a > secondary arch until we have everything in place for it to be 100% success. > Unless niagara based systems start flooding the market place i don't see > sparc as having a large user base. but i enjoy working on it. What I'm trying to say is that one of the things we're trying to solve with the new arch policy is the hardware issue - we want people to be able to interface with the Fedora build system with hardware that isn't in our server locations. Even if there is a groundswell for Fedora/390, no one's going to send us a mainframe (and, honestly, even if they were, I'm pretty sure we wouldn't want to deal with it ;) ) - therefore, it's best to design the policy so that it can work for community-supported arches who house the hardware themselves. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
