Re: Architecture Policy.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:42:42PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
 > On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:11, Rex Dieter wrote:
 > > Those example items (Intel compiler, modified rpmoptflags) aren't from
 > > stock Fedora, so the answer is easy, it's no longer Fedora.
 > 
 > Sure, but how can you tell?  How can you tell what somebody might have done to 
 > get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up in an iso?

The intel compiler is an easy one - you can't compile the kernel (and probably
a bunch of other apps) without patches right now.  I see your point
though, rpmoptflags would be a trickier one to spot.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux