Re: Architecture Policy.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> That can't account for people getting things directly from mirrors.  And
> if a certain large PowerPC company has an internal tier 1 mirror of
> Fedora you won't get any hits from there for PPC.  Remember, 90% of all
> statistics are lies ;)

True, but in the absence of anything, we have to go with the statistics
we have, and those statistics say that PPC ranges from 0.4% of the userbase
(Mike's graph) to 1.59% (bittorrent stats.) And I don't think we can
just handwave 'that's not relevant', especially considering that some
of those large PowerPC companies machines obviously aren't being tested
with Fedora. (see: iSeries)

Bill

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux