Re: Architecture Policy.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:19 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> Note, in no way am I saying this is a failure on your part, I completely
> realise that you've been buried alive in OLPC stuff the last few months,
> but we don't have a "stand-in dwmw2".  There may be a handful of
> @redhat.com folks with the prerequisite ppc knowledge, but unless they
> have a) the time and b) the motivation, these bugs aren't going to get fixed.
> I've tried engaging upstream (benh, paulus etc) on some of the obvious
> PPC bugs, some stick, and then get fixed upstream, others.. not so much.

Is there a way to auto-CC someone on a per-arch basis in bugzilla?
Contrary to popular belief, we do have a PPC userbase in Fedora and some
of them even have kernel-fu.

josh

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux