Seems we talked at cross purposes a bit. Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Friday 03 November 2006 10:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> I'm not saying we need FF 2 as a official update now. Get it out in one >> or two months when most extensions are fixed. Or put it in a special >> repo (as aiglx in FC5) and maintain it there for those interested. > So first you're complaining that FF2 wasn't made available for FC6, > and now you're saying it shouldn't be, I said it doesn't match "Fedora is about the rapid progress of Free and Open Source software and content." if Ubtuntu can ship with it two days later. Further: I think it is okay that it was not shipped. But we should explain the reasons to our users and give them a outlook like "We'll probably ship it as a update" > only when its ready, and that it should be > made available in a special repo for those to test. Yes. > I seem to remember Chris Aillon posting up FF2 rpms for FC6 systems They are tagged with "fc7". Most users will fear that. > a while > ago, and got all of some 50~ downloaders. He still feels its not ready for > FC6, but it is in rawhide. How is this NOT what you wanted to see? I would like to see FF at a place like http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/projects/ (not "only" on people") and with a repo file that people can easily install. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
