Re: looking at our surrent state a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 03 November 2006 10:19, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Well, take Comaintainership as example. We need
>
> - acl support in the build system

See the Infrastructure pages regarding VCS.  The dist-hg proof of concept 
makes each package release dir its own repo and thus able to have ACLs.

> - a package database to get per dist maintainers

Don't have much to say here.

> - a better framework to make it easier to watch what the people you
> sponsored changes in cvs

This again is part of the VCS changes, but could also be handled by email 
filtering of the commits list.

>
> That's a lot of work (mainly on the infrastructure side) and I more and
> more get the impression that with our current manpower it will take one
> or two years until we might have it in place. A little bit help from
> someone that getting payed for his work might help

We ARE helping.  Would you like a pony too?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpoWzz0Dh9do.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux