On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:07:44 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > * FE6 seems to be okay as well (Extras didn't manage to push a proper > comps.xml in time -- shame on us) JFYI: An updated comps.xml is in place since the day before yesterday (this is too late for the FC6 roll-out, but read on below), and I might help with updating it in an automated way, too. Once more this shows that communication is far worse than it could be. The comps.xml files in the repository have _not_ been updated since April 17th. That makes me wonder why contributors have been asked to add new entries in CVS and why a "comps SIG" has been created? There also doesn't seem to be any public communication about what the 2-3 people, who have "comps.xml automation" assigned to themselves, are working on or what they have discussed before. That is a "behind closed doors" development model, where any contributions from outside bear the risk of being wasted time (because of redundancy, reinventing the wheel or because of going into a different direction). _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
