On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:42:20PM -0500, Michael Tiemann wrote:
> I have a question I'm hoping you can help me answer. The question is:
> how many core and how many extras development trees are hosted on
> sourceforge, gforge, collab.net, and any and all other hosted
> development infrastructures? I'm trying to understand which, if any of
> these types of sites, has achieved some reasonable market share. Thanks
> for any pointers you may be able to provide.
Of the packages URL lines that exist, here's what those claim. I only
list those that have 5 or more SRPMS with the same URL (or same
dereferenced DNS alias).
5 0pointer.de
5 cairographics.org
5 ctan.org
5 gtk.org
5 kernel.org
5 mysql.com
5 oss.sgi.com
5 pear.php.net
5 riverbankcomputing.co.uk
5 unicorn.berlios.de
5 xiph.org
6 extragear.kde.org
6 galago-project.org
6 gstreamer.freedesktop.org
6 libsdl.org
6 opendap.org
7 gnupg.org
7 go-mono.com
7 linux.duke.edu
7 turbogears.org
8 annarchy.freedesktop.org
8 fedoraproject.org
8 mozilla.org
8 scim-im.org
9 opensync.org
9 window.gnome.org
10 worldforge.org
11 projects.sourceforge.jp
13 people.redhat.com
15 freedesktop.org
15 moria.seul.org
16 redhat.com
18 kde.org
18 sources.redhat.com
19 fedora.redhat.com
19 goodies.xfce.org
21 xfce.org
22 ftp.acc.umu.se
24 jakarta.apache.org
24 nongnu.org
30 aspell.net
35 pair12.php.net
57 sourceforge.net
60 gnome.org
64 gnu.org
121 x.org
230 (none)
487 projects.sourceforge.net
517 cpansearch.perl.org
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
