Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
I hope you are understanding it correctly because that is how I
understand it. I think this is the best idea I have heard so far.
There is a subset of users -- we don't know how large -- who will never
use yum because either (a) they won't have the bandwidth to use it, or (b)
they won't even understand that they need to use it.
I still think that the Firefox technique will give us a better
cross-section of data.
Let me think about it. I need to send a note to the docs folks anyway --
part apology, part analysis. I'll cc: this group as well.
I was particular that we dont lose out a important metric and related
benefits because of the process being not ideal. I think with yum mirror
list and yum-updatesd installed by default in Fedora Core 6 we get
enough data non intrusively that we dont need to rush this up right now.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
