On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 08:06 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 9/27/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 08:41 -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote: > > - moinmoin has been 'openid enabled' - but only in 1.5.X - not the > > version we're using right now - 1.3.X. We should be able to move to it - > > but it will be an involved process, I'm sure. Not the least of which is > > getting all the people to now create openid accounts. And this says > > nothing of the need for the CLA that we require. > > > > - mailman - it has been openid enabled but not in the upstream release. > > Patches are available. > > > > - bugzilla appears to be completely out in the cold which means there > > would be a need for someone to do the programming and, theoretically, > > submitting the patches upstream. > > > > So we'd have to refit a good portion of our infrastructure (some of > > which also serves @redhat.com not just fedora) and we'd have to get our > > users to migrate to the new login mechanism. I'm not saying it's > > impossible but I think we're looking at a development time and migration > > path that IF we have people willing to undertake it will take greater > > than a year. > > > > -sv > > > > We're re-designing the accounting system right now anyway, we could > certainly look into doing something like this. For those that don't > know here's the draft page: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem2/ > <nod> I just don't want anyone getting their hopes up for a quick turnaround. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
