Re: Fedora Core steering committee and public weekly meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
Post release critical bug fixes too.

So.... this is not done for extras - do we have a committee that disallows
extras builds based on schedule timeframe? Should we?

Bill

If we are going to move KDE into extras and I assuming that we are moving with that process immediately post FC6 release, then Fedora Extras on media is a pre requisite to that. Moving off from a rolling release model would mean that the release engineering team (current or expanded) should handle freeze processes in extras too.

I have already stated my opinion that I would prefer a technical committee that covers both Fedora Core and Extras and merge FESCo into it. I wanted core to work as a project in a very similar public fashion to other sub projects before that happens as a first step but if we can do all at the same time, then its even better.

There are a number of other things that are tied together. Open up core, open up brew or just move into using plague and external build systems, open the compose tool or write a new one, move into a distributed SCM, release live cd's with a hard disk installation feature for those who dont want to download all of Fedora (core+extras) as CD/DVD's and a live cd tool to do variations of it. If the variations are a pure subset of core+extras repository it can be called Fedora <something>, otherwise not.

Fedora Project would then initially do one release of the Live CD thing (assuming GNOME here) and let the community do whatever other variations it wants. In this model, KDE wouldnt move over to extras (they wouldnt a extras). We can just change maintainers without a fuss and KDE SIG or whatever can do Fedora KDE live CD's to promote it.

In my mind, the governance model should be

                 Fedora Board
                      |
FAB(Community issues) Fedora Technical Committee (Packaging committee as a subset)
                       |

       Sub project Steering Committee's


The Board lead with veto power is a non elected position within Red Hat (currently served by Max Spevack). Rest of the board and sub project steering committee's can be elected. FAB, Fedora technical and packaging committee is not. The Board hand picks them.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux