On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 12:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > $subject is what would make Fedora Core qualify as a good sub project. > > Currently there is a lot of active development obviously but there isnt > > much visibility into the decision making processes and who is involved. > > > > My suggestion would be get the release engineering team and a few people > > preferably some external to Red Hat to be part of the Fedora Core > > steering committee and hold public weekly meetings in #fedora-devel in a > > predetermined schedule and post meeting logs etc in a similar fashion to > > Fedora Ambassadors or FESCo meetings. > > Well, it currently *has* a committee, we just don't have public meetings > or logs. Who is on the committee? And is there any reason they couldn't be public? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
