On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 20:46 +0530, Rahul wrote: > $subject is what would make Fedora Core qualify as a good sub project. > Currently there is a lot of active development obviously but there isnt > much visibility into the decision making processes and who is involved. > > My suggestion would be get the release engineering team and a few people > preferably some external to Red Hat to be part of the Fedora Core > steering committee and hold public weekly meetings in #fedora-devel in a > predetermined schedule and post meeting logs etc in a similar fashion to > Fedora Ambassadors or FESCo meetings. That sounds like a good idea. More transparency in discussions is a good thing in my opinion. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
