Re: kernel modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:39, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> We'll learn as we go, and maybe we'll decide that it totally sucks.
> (Failure needs to be OK, IMHO.  If we're not failing we're not trying.)
>   Or maybe we'll learn that we need to change the way the package system
> works for the kernel.  But right now we can't even figure that out
> because we're not even willing to try.

We've tried it internally with the gfs modules.  The modules were maintained 
internally with full access to the kernel developers and the build system and 
all that, and it was _still_ a disaster.  An utter failure IMHO.  I'm not 
really interested in trying the same thing over and over expecting different 
results.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpBZwlgjEx4X.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux