Re: Re: openmotif

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul W. Frields wrote:


Frankly, I'm a little surprised, after our previous discussions on
whether we should pursue FSF endorsement in some fashion, that we would
wring our hands much about this.  We've agreed that openmotif is not
free.  Fedora only ships free software.  Rahul, you have said this to
many people, many times.

Yes but I have also been telling many people that we should do things in a way that doesnt affect end users and our contributors. Pretty much all of the openmotif dependencies in Fedora Core and Extras can be fixed with lesstif. #3 is disruptive. #1 doesnt make much sense to me since we havent included libraries in Fedora Core unless we had actual applications in Fedora Core dependent on them. Since there is already support to move all the openmotif dependencies into Fedora Extras, I dont see why we need to retain openmotif in Fedora Core. We moved GNOME 1.x libs to Fedora Extras soon after GNUCash got into the GTK 2.x bandwagon. The current situation isnt very different. The dumping argument is a red herring. Anyway, I am not going to waste more bandwidth on this. If you guys believe that dumping out all the applications now makes more sense, go ahead.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux