On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 01:09 +0530, Rahul wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > 1) openmotif stays in Core, packages which depend on it move to Extras > > Reviews. Packages are ported to another toolkit so openmotif can get > > booted from Core and a time period is established for openmotif to be > > booted. > > > > 2) openmotif is moved to Extras along with all the packages that depend > > on it. Packages are ported to another toolkit so openmotif can get > > booted from Extras and a time period is established for openmotif to be > > booted. > > > > 3) openmotif is dropped from Core and Extras. Maybe it moves to a third > > party repository. Packages which can work with lesstif remain in the > > same repository as lesstif, those that can't are dropped or picked up by > > a third part repository until they can run with one of the OSI/FSF > > approved toolkits. > > > #2 is exactly what I am suggesting. I know. That's why I listed it. It's also the only one of the three that I am against for the reasons stated in the previous message. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
