On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:16 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 13:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Right. However, we should *announce* that it's going away for FC-6, then > > fix the dependent apps as best as possible, then remove it; not remove > > first. > > Do we have time on the FC-6 schedule for this? Or to rephrase: If we don't have time allotted in the schedule to handle this disruption, we should add some in order to try and alleviate the pain. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
