On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 09:36 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > And it's a great example of why not having the community participate > directly means small shit like that goes unfixed. Could have been easy > as a quick review. +1 People employed at Red Hat may be paid to work on Fedora (well, not me, but some of us :), but that doesn't mean we are immune to overwork, stress, and poor reactions. Fixing the people involved is a short-term solution. Making them have less pain is better for the mid-term, at least. Less anyone think I am condoning bad behavior, I am not. I am just saying it is inevitable in situations like this. Changing the situation yields the best results. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
