On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 14:09 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > (p.s. this distinction would make it incumbent upon the board to audit the > current "projects" to decide which are Projects and which are SIGs. For > instance... Live CD? Free Media? Sponsored Media? And if these are > official projects, who are the official heads?) I didn't want to see this fall by the wayside, as it did (in my head at least) before I was rereading everything while editing the wiki page in question. Excellent point, Greg! Does anyone not agree that there is a need to do this? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
