On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 16:03 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:54 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 15:51 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:47, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > > > To handle this, I propose creating a 'Fedora Hosted Projects' or 'Fedora > > > > > Projects' bugzilla Product, and have things such as 'mock' and 'plague' > > > > > be components of said product. This way they can have a bug system that > > > > > isn't tied into a given Fedora release or deployment. > > > > > > > > > > Can I get an Ack/Nack on making this happen? I can have it up and ready > > > > > in the next few minutes. > > > > > > > > ACK > > > > > > Any preferences to 'Fedora Hosted Projects' vs 'Fedora Projects' ? > > > > I prefer Fedora Hosted Projects. "Fedora Projects" sounds like projects > > that apply only to Fedora, and that really isn't the case usually (e.g. > > plague). > > Sensible reasoning to me Plus the word "Fedora Project" is already somewhat overloaded. :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
