Re: Fedora Logo Proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 09 August 2006 01:46, Rahul wrote:
> I see no reason here not to have stuff like Aurora or AlphaCore as
> second tier architectures that interested contributors can push forward.
> First step would be to provide Sparc machines to the buildsystem and let
> external contributors work on fixing stuff.

Why do we need to provide hardware?  They've got a lot of hardware currently 
and are able to do development work.  All we really need to do is grant them 
the right to use our Logo in their works.  Once critical mass is reached then 
we could look at providing infrastructure to merge them into Extras, etc...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpKHsev9aNal.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux