Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:25 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > > > * People who are redistributing something based on Fedora, but who are > > > NOT following the above redistribution guidelines, may NOT use the Fedora > > > logo. If they choose to use the text "based on Fedora," we won't stop > > > them. > > > > While I don't disagree with anything in this policy, Aurora would not be > > permitted to use the Fedora logo as we are simply taking Fedora universe > > packages, patching for sparc, and adding sparc specific OSS utils. > > So then the next question would be, "is there anything that precludes you > from adding these utilities into the Fedora Universe?" > > We'd have three options: > > 1. Expand the notion of "Fedora Universe"; > 2. Add special cases for those like the Aurora project; > 3. Allow the Aurora project to make a special request -- which, knowing > your purpose, we'd almost certainly grant. Do #3 until we think of something better? I suppose we'll eventually run into this for other arches, and will need to come up with some sort of non-tier1-arch thing; but until that point, might be best to just do exceptions. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
