On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 15:30 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:13 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > Updated Document: > > > > I am in the process of analyzing the packages currently in Fedora Core > > Development to see whether it is possible/feasible to have Fedora Core > > exist as a 100% free distribution (by the FSF guidelines). > > On IRC, someone claimed that gnuplot was not FSF clean (but is OSI > approved) because it requires the upstream tarball to be pristine; > changes to the source have to be distributed as patches. Have you > checked its license? > > http://gnuplot.cvs.sourceforge.net/gnuplot/gnuplot/Copyright?view=markup David Turner (@ FSF) says it is fine, and we're in compliance with the license as it is written. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
