Karsten Wade wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>
selinux-doc || Public Use License || Examine LICENSE (4)
I can't find an actual copy of this license; googling for:
http://www.google.com/search?q=selinux+%22public+use+license%22
Surprise, surprise ... all references are to the selinux-doc package, no
links to the text of the license.
Depending on how difficult it is, perhaps this one could be relicensed.
Dan Walsh is probably the person to contact. I'd reckon that Red Hat
would -prefer- to license our contributions under the OPL.
Does the OPL qualify as libre by FSF standards? Hope so, because the
release notes are now a stand-along package in Core
(fedora-release-notes), and they are under the OPL.
Yes. The Open Publication License without the optional restrictions that
we dont use in Fedora documentation is indeed considered as a Free
documentation licenses by FSF
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#FreeDocumentationLicenses
I did check this while this license was originally proposed for use
within Fedora instead of GNU FDL. It is also worth noting that our CLA
does grant us relicensing permissions which can be useful on such
circumstances.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
