On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 02:03 +0530, Rahul wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 14:59, Rahul wrote: > >> There is a question of better integration in existing products that goes > >> beyond Red Hat's upstream project involvement though. Random examples of > >> this are Network Manager being shipped enabled by default in various > >> other distributions while Fedora does not. Dogtail just got into Fedora > >> development tree yesterday. Sabayon is in Fedora Extras still. > > > > It really should not matter if these packages are on Core or Extras. They are > > available at install time and that is what matters. > > > > It should not but it clearly does now. What we do later to nullify the > differences doesnt change the current status of these repositories. Red > Hat spend all the effort in creating a tool which has very low amount of > visibility due to decision to provide it in Fedora Extras which is what > I was pointing out. That same decision, however, shows that Red Hat _is_ intending for Fedora to be a community driven distro. It has other benefit IMHO. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
