Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 09:11, Rahul <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
4) CLA completion and being part of atleast one specific Fedora group
like say Fedora Extras must be a requirement. Not everybody who has
signed the CLA has provided any meaningful contributions and thus are
not in the group of actual Fedora contributors. Having merely the CLA as
a requirement might be abused.
How do we define being "part of" a group? Number of CVS commits?
Number of emails posted to a list? Time on IRC? If you can provide an
objective standard for this criterion, let's discuss it.
Part of any Fedora group in the accounts system.
There is no reliable way to say who is active and who is not. It is trivial
to gain membership in most of the groups in the Account System. Unless
someone can think of a superior way to measure active contributors, I think
the CLA requirement is the best we can do.
I do continue to think we can do better. Here is a possible criteria
set. We might have to fine tune it better.
* Signed the CLA
* CVS commits to any of the Fedora Projects
* Triaged or reported X number of bugs in Fedora.
* Participated or organized atleast one event or contributed to
Free/Sponsored media as a Fedora Ambassador
* Member of any of the governing bodies such as committees and board
* Produced any Fedora specific content that is included in the
distribution - Documentation, Artwork etc.
* People who contribute to infrastructure and other management tasks.
Anything that I have missed?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
