On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 18:36 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 08:22 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > As I mentioned briefly in Tuesday's meeting, I placed a short draft of > > an elections document at: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/SuccessionPlanning > > > > I'd appreciate any additional review and comment. (Comments may take > > the form of page edits.) > > My recollection from previous discussion was that we weren't going to > try to get into electing the Red Hat seats and instead leave it at the > discretion of Red Hat as sponsoring the Fedora Project as to how they > got filled. > > This was to avoid some of the concerns about "what if Joe gets shifted > to working on something else", etc Doesn't mean they can't be in the election... the contenders for two seats might be e.g. exactly two Red Hat employees. Vote for any two. :-) But if Red Hat has no preference between three, it could be left up to the community. Or not, see previous case. But if we don't want that door open even a crack, it needn't be. Opinions? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
