On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 15:04 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > > AFAIK Max's position is not an elected one; it's a paid position > > > > inside Red Hat and not subject to election. We can't really elect > > > > someone for Red Hat to put on salary, but we need that position at > > > > the top of the Board to help drive action in the company when > > > > needed. I thought I had written that in the plan, but I see now > > > > that revision was lost in all my rearranging. I'll get it back in. > > > > This would better be discussed after Max returns from vacation, so > > > > hold that thought until then. > > > > > > Right. So then do we need a elected lead? > > > > I don't think so; that's Max's job. Otherwise it's just adding another > > level of middle management. But hey, I could be wrong. > > We need to be clear and transparent on this point: Max is the appointed > lead of the Fedora Project, period -- with veto power, period. > > Ubuntu has their SABDFL -- self-appointed benevolent dictator for life. > We have our MABDUF -- Matthew-appointed benevolent dictator until fired. > hey hey, let's be more clear. Our leader doesn't have to be fired. He could move on to more exciting things like trying to thwap large music companies. :) -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
