Re: fc6 -- new, removed packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:

On Tuesday 18 July 2006 08:18, Mark Webbink wrote:
Just for clarification, Red Hat employees do not need to sign a Fedora CLA.

Perhaps from a legal standpoint at this exact moment in time. However it makes more sense to have the policy apply to ANYBODY so that if they ever leave Red Hat we still have an agreement with them, and Red Hat people aren't special cased.

Setting aside the exact details of legal compliance, I think we should have *everyone* sign the thing. It is one of those policies that isn't difficult to have in place, and it prevents us from having a "special treatment" kind of thing.

We want Fedora to be egalitarian. Everyone should sign the CLA, if not for a legal requirement, then for a "correctness" requirement. Most of the RH folks contributing have signed it already.

--Max

--
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux